From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Michlmayr Subject: Re: PATCH SB1250 NAPI support Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:22:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20060629082222.GA6552@unjust.cyrius.com> References: <20060524125512.GO12089@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060525133505.GH8746@deprecation.cyrius.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Tom Rix , mark.e.mason@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from [65.19.161.204] ([65.19.161.204]:61189 "EHLO sorrow.cyrius.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751796AbWF2IXG (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:23:06 -0400 To: jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Tom Rix [2006-06-04 11:45]: > A while ago I submitted this patch for NAPI support for SB1250 / SB1480. > I have tested it again on the recent (6/3/06) linux-mips kernel. Are there any comments regarding this patch (apart from the fact that Tom forgot to include a Signed-off-by line). Can it go in when it's resent with a Signed-off-by line or does the patch have any other problems? -- Martin Michlmayr tbm@cyrius.com