From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:40:51 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20060630.024051.59274107.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20060630.023258.83835473.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:14092 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026AbWF2Rjw (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:39:52 -0400 To: rdreier@cisco.com In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In article (at Thu, 29 Jun 2006 10:35:56 -0700), Roland Dreier says: > > > Dave, you're going to have to be more specific. What do you mean by > > > RDMA? The whole drivers/infiniband infrastructure, which handles RDMA > > > over IB, has been upstream for a year and a half, and was in fact > > > originally merged by you, so I'm guessing that's not what you mean. > > > > NET_DMA things. > > But NET_DMA seems to be for the new DMA engine support (I/OAT really I > guess?). I had nothing to do with merging any of that, and as far as > I can tell, Dave signed off on all of those changes, so I don't think > that's what he's complaining about either. Oops, sorry, you're right... --yoshfuji