From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 14:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060701.144506.74722126.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060630.141658.34759102.davem@davemloft.net> <1151708503.11835.8.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:5289 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751243AbWGAVpD (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 17:45:03 -0400 To: tom@opengridcomputing.com In-Reply-To: <1151708503.11835.8.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Tom Tucker Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:01:43 -0500 > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 14:16 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > The TOE folks have tried to submit their hooks and drivers > > on several occaisions, and we've rejected it every time. > > iWARP != TOE You are taking my comment out of context. And the fact that you removed the comment I am respond to, shows that you really aren't following the conversation. Roland stated that it has never been the case that we have rejected adding support for a certain class of devices on the kinds of merits being discussed in this thread. And I'm saying that TOE is such a case where we have emphatically done so. So I am not saying iWARP or RDMA is equal to TOE, and if you had actually read this thread you would have understood that. You're just looking for cannon fodder in my emails.