From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [PKT_SCHED]: Fix illegal memory dereferences when dumping actions Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 11:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20060705090933.GW14627@postel.suug.ch> References: <20060704220504.787776000@postel.suug.ch> <20060704220549.952720000@postel.suug.ch> <44AAFCF6.9000706@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca Return-path: Received: from postel.suug.ch ([194.88.212.233]:47827 "EHLO postel.suug.ch") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964774AbWGEJJM (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 05:09:12 -0400 To: Patrick McHardy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44AAFCF6.9000706@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org * Patrick McHardy 2006-07-05 01:42 > Thomas Graf wrote: > > @@ -834,7 +833,7 @@ tc_dump_action(struct sk_buff *skb, stru > > a.ops = a_o; > > > > if (a_o->walk == NULL) { > > - printk("tc_dump_action: %s !capable of dumping table\n", kind); > > + printk("tc_dump_action: %s !capable of dumping table\n", a_o->kind); > > goto rtattr_failure; > > } > > Can't we just get rid of these printks? This seems like a good > opportunity. I agree, since this patch is definitely a stable candidate I wanted it to stay as small as possible.