From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 23:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060706.235320.92562667.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060705.200325.74731166.davem@davemloft.net> <1152163503.20248.98.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:36052 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbWGGGxC (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 02:53:02 -0400 To: tom@opengridcomputing.com In-Reply-To: <1152163503.20248.98.camel@trinity.ogc.int> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Tom Tucker Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 00:25:03 -0500 > This patch is about dotting I's and crossing T's, it's not about > foundations. You assume that I've flat out rejected RDMA, in fact I haven't. I really don't have enough information to form a final opinion yet. There's about a week of emails on this topic which I need to read and digest first. What I am saying, however, is that we need to understand the technology and the hooks you guys want before we put any of it in. I don't think that's unreasonable.