From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH]NET: Add ECN support for TSO Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 14:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060707.145932.66155147.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC041BD9C@NT-IRVA-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:8888 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932338AbWGGV7E (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:59:04 -0400 To: mchan@broadcom.com In-Reply-To: <1551EAE59135BE47B544934E30FC4FC041BD9C@NT-IRVA-0751.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: "Michael Chan" Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:57:11 -0700 > RFC3540 is still experimental I believe and it is not implemented > in the Linux stack. Even if it is implemented and the NS bit is set, > I think the TSO logic can simply replicate the NS bit as each TSO > divided segment contains the same acknowledgement information from > the original super segment. > > We should hear Herbert, David, or others' opinions on this. I'm studying the RFC right now just to make sure your assesment is accurate. It probably is :)