* [AX.25] Optimize AX.25 socket list lock
@ 2006-07-11 22:20 Ralf Baechle
2006-07-12 20:25 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2006-07-11 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, netdev, linux-hams
Right now all uses of the ax25_list_lock lock are _bh locks but knowing
some code is only ever getting invoked from _bh context we can better.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
---
net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 14 +++++++-------
net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c | 8 ++++----
net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Index: linux-net/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
===================================================================
--- linux-net.orig/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c 2006-07-11 22:51:41.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-net/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c 2006-07-11 23:15:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void ax25_ds_enquiry_response(ax25_cb *a
ax25_start_t3timer(ax25);
ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25->ax25_dev);
- spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(ax25o, node, &ax25_list) {
if (ax25o == ax25)
continue;
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void ax25_ds_enquiry_response(ax25_cb *a
if (ax25o->state != AX25_STATE_0)
ax25_start_t3timer(ax25o);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
}
void ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25_cb *ax25)
@@ -162,13 +162,13 @@ static int ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_de
int res = 0;
struct hlist_node *node;
- spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(ax25, node, &ax25_list)
if (ax25->ax25_dev == ax25_dev && (ax25->condition & AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE) && ax25->state > AX25_STATE_1) {
res = 1;
break;
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
return res;
}
Index: linux-net/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-net.orig/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c 2006-07-11 22:51:44.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-net/net/ax25/ax25_ds_timer.c 2006-07-11 23:15:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static void ax25_ds_timeout(unsigned lon
return;
}
- spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(ax25, node, &ax25_list) {
if (ax25->ax25_dev != ax25_dev || !(ax25->condition & AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE))
continue;
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void ax25_ds_timeout(unsigned lon
ax25_send_control(ax25, AX25_DISC, AX25_POLLON, AX25_COMMAND);
ax25_disconnect(ax25, ETIMEDOUT);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25_dev);
}
Index: linux-net/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
===================================================================
--- linux-net.orig/net/ax25/af_ax25.c 2006-07-11 22:51:44.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-net/net/ax25/af_ax25.c 2006-07-11 23:15:00.000000000 +0100
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct sock *ax25_find_listener(ax25_add
ax25_cb *s;
struct hlist_node *node;
- spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(s, node, &ax25_list) {
if ((s->iamdigi && !digi) || (!s->iamdigi && digi))
continue;
@@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ struct sock *ax25_find_listener(ax25_add
/* If device is null we match any device */
if (s->ax25_dev == NULL || s->ax25_dev->dev == dev) {
sock_hold(s->sk);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
return s->sk;
}
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
return NULL;
}
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ struct sock *ax25_get_socket(ax25_addres
ax25_cb *s;
struct hlist_node *node;
- spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(s, node, &ax25_list) {
if (s->sk && !ax25cmp(&s->source_addr, my_addr) &&
!ax25cmp(&s->dest_addr, dest_addr) &&
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ struct sock *ax25_get_socket(ax25_addres
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
return sk;
}
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void ax25_send_to_raw(ax25_address *addr
struct sk_buff *copy;
struct hlist_node *node;
- spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
ax25_for_each(s, node, &ax25_list) {
if (s->sk != NULL && ax25cmp(&s->source_addr, addr) == 0 &&
s->sk->sk_type == SOCK_RAW &&
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void ax25_send_to_raw(ax25_address *addr
kfree_skb(copy);
}
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
}
/*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [AX.25] Optimize AX.25 socket list lock
2006-07-11 22:20 [AX.25] Optimize AX.25 socket list lock Ralf Baechle
@ 2006-07-12 20:25 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2006-07-12 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ralf; +Cc: netdev, linux-hams
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:20:45 +0100
> Right now all uses of the ax25_list_lock lock are _bh locks but knowing
> some code is only ever getting invoked from _bh context we can better.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Applied, thanks Ralf.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-12 20:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-11 22:20 [AX.25] Optimize AX.25 socket list lock Ralf Baechle
2006-07-12 20:25 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).