From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Alternate to Ixia's ANVL test harness for tcp compliance.
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20060720.141759.63999284.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1153424967.8114.450.camel@piet2.bluelane.com>
	<44BFE1D2.8060004@garzik.org>
	<1153427074.8114.466.camel@piet2.bluelane.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@osdl.org,
	ak@suse.de, piet@work.piet.net, rksaini@gmail.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:16077
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1030352AbWGTVR4 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:17:56 -0400
To: piet@bluelane.com
In-Reply-To: <1153427074.8114.466.camel@piet2.bluelane.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Piet Delaney <piet@bluelane.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:24:34 -0700

> I wonder if Microsoft is providing the "big challenge" to porting the
> same GUI to linux. The world really doesn't need yet another Java
> language. Gosling is a Genius, I studied his X11 News Server enough
> to know first hand. Microsoft lost in court with their violating the
> Java standards and C sharp seems to be just another stratagy to their
> bizarre attempt to world domination (Like the SCO mess).

Under Linux we have Mono as a C-sharp implementation.  For the kind of
GUI they most likely have, porting shouldn't be much of an issue at
all.