From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug in pskb_trim_rcsum() Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060724.233653.71166298.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060718113245.GA12040@gondor.apana.org.au> <20060718125439.GA19770@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20060718130404.GA12785@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:33213 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751459AbWGYGhE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 02:37:04 -0400 To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au In-Reply-To: <20060718130404.GA12785@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Herbert Xu Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:04:04 +1000 > Actually, I plan to differentiate between RX CHECKSUM_HW and TX > CHECKSUM_HW. Now that we have things like Xen it is possible for > RX packets to have patial checksums too. > > When this is done loopback can send TX CHECKSUM_HW packets instead > of CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY (I'm currently calling this CHECKSUM_PARTIAL). This sounds like a good idea. Undoing CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY when trimming is definitely going to break loopback the way things are done currently.