From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Can we have GET_NETDEV_DEV?
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:26:06 -0700
Message-ID: <20060725142606.0a44d258@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1153803145.23803.19.camel@dv>
	<20060725102005.7edb5509@localhost.localdomain>
	<1153861691.2288.14.camel@dv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:42695 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964859AbWGYV0N (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:26:13 -0400
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <1153861691.2288.14.camel@dv>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:08:11 -0400
Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hello, Stephen!
> 
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 10:20 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
> > So how about these wrappers.
> 
> > +static inline void netdev_set_pdev(struct net_device *dev, struct device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	dev->class_dev.dev = pdev;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct device *netdev_get_pdev(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	return dev->class_dev.dev;
> > +}
> 
> The positive effect of a macro is that if would allow MadWifi to prepare
> in advance by testing if GET_NETDEV_DEV is defined.
> 
> The functions may or may not be useful for the code in the kernel, but
> I'll not be able to prepare MadWifi unless I know the kernel version in
> which they will appear.
> 
> Considering the drivers that are already in the kernel, you may prefer
> to have a more high-level function that would clone the network device
> by copying most of the net_device structure.  I think netdev_get_pdev()
> would be mostly used for such cloning if implemented.
> 

What is the wireless tree using for this?