From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hsantos@av.it.pt
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kazunori@miyazawa.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: Regarding offloading IPv6 addrconf and ndisc
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:27:43 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060727.192743.39159331.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060728014528.GB29313@innerghost.net>
From: Hugo Santos <hsantos@av.it.pt>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:45:28 +0100
> Is it reasonable to consider that control packet processing needs to
> be serialized with data packet processing? In this particular case, is
> it not the tests that are broken if not giving enough time to the host
> to configure the address? The standards do not specify implementation
> details so no specific processing model should be assumed, and what you
> describe sounds a bit like an ideal model.
Just like a TCP connection, packets cause state transitions.
And it is reasonable to expect that after a state transition,
the effects can be visible by subsequent packets.
I think the tests are doing valid things.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-28 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-27 11:25 Regarding offloading IPv6 addrconf and ndisc Hugo Santos
2006-07-27 12:25 ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2006-07-27 17:56 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-27 23:56 ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-28 1:34 ` David Miller
2006-07-28 1:45 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28 2:27 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-07-28 3:13 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28 3:20 ` David Miller
2006-07-28 3:31 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28 4:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-28 8:34 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28 12:45 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-07-29 13:34 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-30 3:28 ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2006-07-30 11:30 ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-31 21:23 ` David Miller
2006-08-01 11:50 ` Hugo Santos
2006-08-01 21:54 ` David Miller
2006-08-01 0:16 ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2006-07-28 2:22 ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-28 2:33 ` David Miller
2006-08-01 0:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-01 0:46 ` David Miller
2006-08-01 0:49 ` Roland Dreier
2006-08-01 1:24 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-08-01 1:30 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-01 1:47 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-08-01 12:13 ` Hugo Santos
2006-08-01 12:00 ` Hugo Santos
2006-08-01 21:57 ` David Miller
2006-08-03 13:28 ` Ingo Oeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060727.192743.39159331.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hsantos@av.it.pt \
--cc=kazunori@miyazawa.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).