From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:43:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20060727144315.GD22935@tuxdriver.com> References: <20060710152032.GA8540@elf.ucw.cz> <44B2940A.2080102@pobox.com> <200607102305.06572.mb@bu3sch.de> <20060711133227.GA1650@elf.ucw.cz> <1152679198.3496.99.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pavel Machek , Michael Buesch , Jeff Garzik , jketreno@linux.intel.com, Netdev list , kernel list Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:53775 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750705AbWG0Oqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:46:51 -0400 To: Zhu Yi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1152679198.3496.99.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:39:58PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:32 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Probably not. This (very dirty) hack implements that (with some level > > of success -- ifconfig down/ifconfig up is enough to get wireless > > working). > > You just need to > > $ iwpriv ethX reset I presume that this is sufficient, and I can drop this thread (except the comment cleanup patch)? John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com