From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] NetLabel: core network changes Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060728.125541.78492222.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060717155822.315389000@hp.com> <20060728.005542.21593420.davem@davemloft.net> <44CA5B61.3010704@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, sds@epoch.ncsc.mil, jmorris@redhat.com, pratt@argus-systems.com Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:32211 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030286AbWG1Tzl (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:55:41 -0400 To: paul.moore@hp.com In-Reply-To: <44CA5B61.3010704@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Paul Moore Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:45:53 -0400 > I'm happy to drop this hook as it *looks* like the MLSXFRM patchset is > going to make it which has some of the accept hooks I was hoping to get, > but figured I stood a "snowballs chance in hell" trying to get it in > solely for use with CIPSO :) I'll drop this on the next release of the > NetLabel patchset and assuming both the NetLabel and the MLSXFRM > patchset make it into the 2.6.19 release I'll issue another small > patchset then to integrate into the new LSM hooks for accept. I'd do it > now but I think it would cause too much of a mess with patch > dependencies/collisions/etc. The MLSXFRM stuff is already queued up in my 2.6.19 tree at: master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.19.git so you can make your work relative to that if you wish.