From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [IPV6]: Multiple Routing Tables Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:28:47 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20060729.132847.15557224.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20060726221849.495778268@postel.suug.ch> <20060729.131306.80352422.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20060728.211428.26968121.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tgraf@suug.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org, vnuorval@tcs.hut.fi, usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org, anttit@tcs.hut.fi, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:23047 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161449AbWG2E1V (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jul 2006 00:27:21 -0400 To: davem@davemloft.net In-Reply-To: <20060728.211428.26968121.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In article <20060728.211428.26968121.davem@davemloft.net> (at Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:14:28 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller says: > For now I would suggest we use Thomas's approach, and we > can make performance measurements to determine if it makes > to optimize this or consider other methods. Okay. --yoshfuji