netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: "Wei Yongjun" <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 udpInDatagrams counter error
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:57:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200607310957.50332@strip-the-willow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <075801c6b47d$08c49350$6004a8c0@WeiYongjun>

Hi,
  
|  if (!sk->sk_filter && skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) {
|  
|  IPv6 doesn't do this, so I think delete condition 'sk->sk_filter' is better. 
|  Do you think so?
I think the sk->sk_filter is there for a good reason. If you delete it, that routine
is forced to always compute UDP checksums, even if the only receiving application is 
a tcpdump process. I may be wrong here, but I think that deleting the sk_filter statement
is not at a good idea. 

The other alternatives discussed (afaik) so far were:

1) Move the increment of UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS from udp_queue_rcv_skb() to udp_recvmsg()
   (first patch uploaded to  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6660). This
   was discussed: not a good idea, since in-kernel applications may use the data_ready
   handler rather than udp_recvmsg().

2) Decrement UDP_MIB_INDATAGRAMS in udp_recvmsg() when the checksum turns out to be
   wrong (second patch uploaded to above address). This would be a fix to the problem 
   you are stating, it also solves the problem of missing out the data_ready handlers in
   (1), and was suggested earlier on this mailing list.
  
-- Gerrit

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-31  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-31  8:51 [PATCH] SNMPv2 udpInDatagrams counter error Wei Yongjun
2006-07-31  8:19 ` Gerrit Renker
     [not found]   ` <075801c6b47d$08c49350$6004a8c0@WeiYongjun>
2006-07-31  8:57     ` Gerrit Renker [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-31 10:03 Wei Yongjun
2006-07-31 10:42 ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-31 11:21 Wei Yongjun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200607310957.50332@strip-the-willow \
    --to=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).