netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugo Santos <hsantos@av.it.pt>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: ak@suse.de, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kazunori@miyazawa.org,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: Regarding offloading IPv6 addrconf and ndisc
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:00:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060801120003.GY8334@innerghost.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060731.174641.99457765.davem@davemloft.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1890 bytes --]

David,

> To drive this home even more, I do not believe that the people who
> advocate pushing NDISC and ARP policy into userspace would be very
> happy if something like the RAID transformations were moved into
> userspace and they were not able to access their disks if the RAID
> transformer process in userspace died.

   How would you restart the RAID controller daemon if it's stored
 in the RAID itself? Also, assuming the same code quality (and ignoring
 OOM killer for a moment), if the RAID controller daemon dies, if that
 code was in the kernel, it would also possibly crash the whole kernel.

> At that point, network access equals disk access.  It would be amusing
> to need to restart such an NDISC/ARP daemon if it were to live on a
> remote volume. :-)

   What you are saying is that, well, the NDISC handling is already in
 the host's memory (kernel text), so the connection could be restarted
 with the remote storage facility. So, let's be fair, and say that
 somehow the NDISC daemon would be available localy?

> I understand full well that on special purpose network devices this
> control vs. data plane seperation into userspace might make a lot of
> sense.  But for a general purpose operating system, such as Linux, the
> greater concern is resiliency to failures and each piece of core
> functionality you move to userspace is a new potential point of
> failure.

   I think 100% of Linux's users want stability. Resiliency to failure
 is not something that depends on the kernel. If the code in question is
 in the kernel, and it crashes, how will you recover?

   Please note that i'm not making this a monolithic vs. micro- kernel
 discussion (i wouldn't want Linus to step in and kick me to hell), but
 if we have the possibility of not having _complex_ interactions within
 the kernel, we are making the kernel itself more resilient to failure.

   Hugo


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-01 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-27 11:25 Regarding offloading IPv6 addrconf and ndisc Hugo Santos
2006-07-27 12:25 ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2006-07-27 17:56   ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-27 23:56   ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-28  1:34     ` David Miller
2006-07-28  1:45       ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28  2:27         ` David Miller
2006-07-28  3:13           ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28  3:20             ` David Miller
2006-07-28  3:31               ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28  4:07                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-28  8:34                   ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-28 12:45                     ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-07-29 13:34                       ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-30  3:28                         ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2006-07-30 11:30                           ` Hugo Santos
2006-07-31 21:23                             ` David Miller
2006-08-01 11:50                               ` Hugo Santos
2006-08-01 21:54                                 ` David Miller
2006-08-01  0:16                             ` Kazunori Miyazawa
2006-07-28  2:22       ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-28  2:33         ` David Miller
2006-08-01  0:31       ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-01  0:46         ` David Miller
2006-08-01  0:49           ` Roland Dreier
2006-08-01  1:24             ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-08-01  1:30               ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-01  1:47                 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-08-01 12:13                   ` Hugo Santos
2006-08-01 12:00           ` Hugo Santos [this message]
2006-08-01 21:57             ` David Miller
2006-08-03 13:28               ` Ingo Oeser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060801120003.GY8334@innerghost.net \
    --to=hsantos@av.it.pt \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kazunori@miyazawa.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).