From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ulrich Kunitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] zd1211rw: Pass more management frame types up to host Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:09:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20060803060905.GA1622@p15091797.pureserver.info> References: <1154468615618-git-send-email-kune@deine-taler.de> <1154468615613-git-send-email-kune@deine-taler.de> <20060802215828.GB5084@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsd@gentoo.org Return-path: Received: from deine-taler.de ([217.160.107.63]:62946 "EHLO p15091797.pureserver.info") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932369AbWHCGJH (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Aug 2006 02:09:07 -0400 To: "John W. Linville" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060802215828.GB5084@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 06-08-02 17:58 John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:43:31PM +0200, Ulrich Kunitz wrote: > > From: Daniel Drake > > > > We'll be needing these at some point... > > This one doesn't really seem like a fix. But since the later fixes > seem to depend on it, I guess it makes sense to take it. > > I just didn't want you to think I wasn't looking... :-) John, you are absolutely right. The patch is needed, because the patch sequence would break without it. Would it be acceptable if I hint on such "bridge" patches in the futture or should we create a clean patch sequence? The latter would require us to rewrite patches manually. BTW we will have a greater number of patches for 2.6.19 (around 30), which supports more devices and also cleans stuff. Some work is however still required. Regards, Uli -- Uli Kunitz