netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Alan Shieh <ashieh@cs.cornell.edu>
Cc: linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Packet reordering in pcap capture file
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 09:21:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060805092154.040e57e1@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44D448A6.6020803@cs.cornell.edu>

On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 03:28:38 -0400
Alan Shieh <ashieh@cs.cornell.edu> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> I sometimes see packets stored out of order in pcap files that generated 
> by "tcpdump -i any" on kernel 2.4.26 with all packets arriving and 
> departing on an e1000 NIC. That is, the ordering by receive timestamp on 
> the packets is not the same as the ordering of the packets within the file.
> 
> In my precise scenario, packets of RX packets show up in the log 230 ms 
> later than they ought to based on the receive timestamp. The kernel 
> behavior (e.g., the packets that are sent by this node) seems to reflect 
> the arrival of the Rx packet at the position in the logfile, rather than 
> the arrival time according to the timestamp.
> 
> What are some of the known causes of this behavior? I'd like to know 
> what locks, etc. might be causing this processing / capture delay.

SMP or single CPU? What is the clock source being used?
If you had a CPU like dual-core AMD that doesn't sync TSC's and
that was the clock source, the timestamps could be wrong.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-05 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-05  7:28 Packet reordering in pcap capture file Alan Shieh
2006-08-05 16:21 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-08-07  7:51   ` Alan Shieh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060805092154.040e57e1@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=ashieh@cs.cornell.edu \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).