From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC] avoid unnecessary alignement overhead in skb->data allocation.
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:05:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608071005.57517.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060807060155.GA6487@2ka.mipt.ru>
On Monday 07 August 2006 08:01, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Attached patch allows to avoid unnecessary alignment overhead
> in skb->data allocation.
> Main idea is to allocate struct skb_shared_info from cache when
> addition of sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) ens up in different order
> allocation than initial size order.
> This allows to solve problem with 4k allocations for 1500 MTU and 32k
> allocations for 9k jumbo frames for some chips.
> Patch was not tested, so if idea worth it I will complete it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
>
> + if ((1UL << order) > size + sizeof(void *) + sizeof(struct
> skb_shared_info)) { + data = ____kmalloc(size + sizeof(struct
> skb_shared_info), gfp_mask); + if (!data)
> + goto nodata;
> + memset(skb, 0, offsetof(struct sk_buff, truesize));
> + } else {
> + unsigned long *ptr;
> +
> + data = ____kmalloc(size, gfp_mask);
You certainly want to kmalloc(size + sizeof(void *)) here, dont you ?
> + if (!data)
> + goto nodata;
> + sh = kmem_cache_alloc(skbuff_shared_info_cache, gfp_mask);
> + if (!sh) {
> + kfree(data);
> + goto nodata;
> + }
> + memset(skb, 0, offsetof(struct sk_buff, truesize));
> + skb->shinfo_cache = 1;
> + ptr = data;
> + ptr[size] = sh;
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-07 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-07 6:01 [RFC] avoid unnecessary alignement overhead in skb->data allocation Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-07 6:23 ` David Miller
2006-08-07 6:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-07 7:17 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-07 7:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-07 7:28 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-07 7:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-07 7:39 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-08 0:09 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-08-08 0:41 ` David Miller
2006-08-08 5:24 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-08 5:41 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-08 5:55 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-07 6:29 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-07 6:36 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-08-07 6:42 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-07 8:05 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-08-07 8:14 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608071005.57517.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).