From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060808.225355.78711315.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060808193325.1396.58813.sendpatchset@lappy> <20060809054648.GD17446@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, phillips@google.com Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:20611 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030499AbWHIFxy (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 01:53:54 -0400 To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru In-Reply-To: <20060809054648.GD17446@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Evgeniy Polyakov Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 09:46:48 +0400 > There is another approach for that - do not use slab allocator for > network dataflow at all. It automatically has all you pros amd if > implemented correctly can have a lot of additional usefull and > high-performance features like full zero-copy and total fragmentation > avoidance. Free advertisement for your network tree allocator Evgeniy? :-)