From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage. Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:30:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20060808133035.GA20706@tuxdriver.com> References: <20060808094410.GA29313@ee.oulu.fi> <20060808113851.GA17861@ee.oulu.fi> <20060808125222.GA15855@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pekka Pietikainen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:62477 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964862AbWHHNbs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:31:48 -0400 To: Herbert Xu Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060808125222.GA15855@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:52:22PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:38:51PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > > Could be http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115461336523555&w=2 > > which isn't upstream yet, right? > > That's a separate bug fix which should produce an entirely different > warning. Although I concede that this patch would make your original > warning look slightly different :) > > John, could you please push this to Jeff? Thanks. Already did so, on Friday. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com