netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>, "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: d80211 merge plans
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 07:03:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608090703.45651.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)

Hi,

I am wondering about d80211 mainline merge plans.

Short:
I would like to see a mainline merge of d80211 happening
as soon as possible (next feature merge window).

Long:
I, as one of the main maintainers of the bcm43xx driver, am
maintaining two different branches of the driver at the moment.
It's getting harder and harder, but it's still ok.
But: We are so --><-- close before another branch of the project
must happen. That would mean we would have to maintain four
different branches. I am certainly not going to do this.

One might wonder why we require yet another branch of the driver.
It's simple. Broadcom effectively branched their driver, too. The
new 4.x binary driver version has _many_ differences and does not
even support older chipsets. That makes it necessary for our open
source driver to branch, too. At least for several months. We don't
know, if we are going to branch forever, or if we are going to merge
them after some months when it's stabilized, yet.

To heavily reduce maintainance burden I would like to see d80211
going mainline as soon as possible, so that we can feature-freeze
the softmac port of bcm43xx and reduce maintainance to next to zero
there. So if people want freaky features, we simply point them
to the d80211 port, which would coexist in mainline.

d80211 in mainline would clearly marked as experimental, for sure.
Notes must be added for possibly breaking usermode interfaces.

-- 
Greetings Michael.

             reply	other threads:[~2006-08-09  5:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-09  5:03 Michael Buesch [this message]
2006-08-09  5:40 ` d80211 merge plans Jeff Garzik
2006-08-09 14:37   ` Dan Williams
2006-08-09 20:47   ` Jouni Malinen
2006-08-09  5:48 ` David Miller
2006-08-09  8:19   ` Ivo Van Doorn
2006-08-09 20:09   ` Mohamed Abbas
2006-08-10  6:11     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-08-09  9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200608090703.45651.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).