From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [take6 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:24:42 +0400 Message-ID: <20060809082442.GA18957@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <11551105592821@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060809.005856.104034268.davem@davemloft.net> <20060809080754.GA29783@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060809.012045.21594448.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:64978 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965101AbWHIIZL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 04:25:11 -0400 To: David Miller Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060809.012045.21594448.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 01:20:45AM -0700, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote: > From: Evgeniy Polyakov > Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:07:57 +0400 > > > So you want to review kevent core only at the first point and postpone > > network AIO and the rest implementation after core is correct. > > That's the idea > > > Should I remove poll/timer notifications too? > > That can stay Ok, I will regenerate the lastest patchset completely without AIO stuff (both network and VFS) and resend it soon. Thank you. -- Evgeniy Polyakov