From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: bonding: cannot remove certain named devices Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:02:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20060815140249.15472a82@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20060815194856.GA3869@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <20060815204555.GB4434@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mitch Williams , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:39835 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750712AbWHOVGM (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:06:12 -0400 To: Bill Nottingham In-Reply-To: <20060815204555.GB4434@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:45:55 -0400 Bill Nottingham wrote: > Mitch Williams (mitch.a.williams@intel.com) said: > > Are spaces allowed in interface names anyway? I can't believe that > > bonding is the only area affected by this. > > They're certainly allowed, and the sysfs directory structure, files, > etc. handle it ok. Userspace tends to break in a variety of ways. > > I believe the only invalid character in an interface name is '/'. > The names "." and ".." are also verboten. Names with : in them are for IP aliases.