From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [patch RFC 3/3] b44: convert to ssb module Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:33:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20060815143331.GC28544@tuxdriver.com> References: <200608150014.19661.mb@bu3sch.de> <200608150018.39548.mb@bu3sch.de> <20060815121248.GA28544@tuxdriver.com> <200608151614.16640.mb@bu3sch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, zambrano-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Return-path: To: Michael Buesch Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608151614.16640.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:14:16PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > You can take a look at the new DMA engine code of bcm43xx. > It's the same engine. > > BTW: John, I see that the new DMA engine code is not applied > to wireless-dev (64-bit DMA and >1G support). But I think I > already sent the patch. Where did it get lost? Was it my fault? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115056542006772&w=2 Is this the patch? I think this one is a victim of the "RFT" subject. Oh, and the patch seemed to not be totally working based on this post: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115075858220477&w=2 Was there a newer version that I missed? Did you still want the older version applied anyway? John -- John W. Linville linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org