From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [patch RFC 3/3] b44: convert to ssb module Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:49:58 +0200 Message-ID: <200608151649.58875.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <200608150014.19661.mb@bu3sch.de> <200608151614.16640.mb@bu3sch.de> <20060815143331.GC28544@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, zambrano@broadcom.com Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:962 "EHLO bu3sch.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030325AbWHOOvO (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:51:14 -0400 To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20060815143331.GC28544@tuxdriver.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 15 August 2006 16:33, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 04:14:16PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > You can take a look at the new DMA engine code of bcm43xx. > > It's the same engine. > > > > BTW: John, I see that the new DMA engine code is not applied > > to wireless-dev (64-bit DMA and >1G support). But I think I > > already sent the patch. Where did it get lost? Was it my fault? > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115056542006772&w=2 Hm, I _think_ that was the right one. But I will dig out the right one and resend to make sure things don't randomly break. > Is this the patch? I think this one is a victim of the "RFT" subject. > Oh, and the patch seemed to not be totally working based on this post: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115075858220477&w=2 I think this oops comes from buggy (or too new) firmware. I think we can ignore it for now. -- Greetings Michael.