From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Nottingham Subject: Re: bonding: cannot remove certain named devices Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:49:14 -0400 Message-ID: <20060815214914.GA5307@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> References: <20060815194856.GA3869@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <20060815204555.GB4434@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <20060815140249.15472a82@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mitch Williams , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:13987 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbWHOVtX (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:49:23 -0400 To: Stephen Hemminger Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060815140249.15472a82@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger (shemminger@osdl.org) said: > > They're certainly allowed, and the sysfs directory structure, files, > > etc. handle it ok. Userspace tends to break in a variety of ways. > > > > I believe the only invalid character in an interface name is '/'. > > > > The names "." and ".." are also verboten. Right. Well, I suspect they're verboten-because-some-code-breaks-making-the-directory. > Names with : in them are for IP aliases. That's certainly not enforced at the kernel level. Bill