netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock()
@ 2006-08-15 19:25 Pavel Roskin
  2006-08-15 22:50 ` Dave Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Roskin @ 2006-08-15 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Adrian Bunk

From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>

This is exactly the case when they are needed.  This also fixed a
warning with -Wmissing-prototypes

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
---

 drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h |   12 +++++-------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
index 16db3e1..8fd9b32 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
@@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ extern irqreturn_t orinoco_interrupt(int
 /********************************************************************/
 
 /* These functions *must* be inline or they will break horribly on
- * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. extern
- * inline should prevent the kernel from linking or module from
- * loading if they are not inlined. */
-extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
-			       unsigned long *flags)
+ * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. */
+static __always_inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
+					unsigned long *flags)
 {
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, *flags);
 	if (priv->hw_unavailable) {
@@ -151,8 +149,8 @@ extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct or
 	return 0;
 }
 
-extern inline void orinoco_unlock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
-				  unsigned long *flags)
+static __always_inline void orinoco_unlock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
+					   unsigned long *flags)
 {
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, *flags);
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock()
  2006-08-15 19:25 [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock() Pavel Roskin
@ 2006-08-15 22:50 ` Dave Jones
  2006-08-15 22:54   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Jones @ 2006-08-15 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pavel Roskin; +Cc: netdev, Adrian Bunk

On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:25:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:

 > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
 > index 16db3e1..8fd9b32 100644
 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
 > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
 > @@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ extern irqreturn_t orinoco_interrupt(int
 >  /********************************************************************/
 >  
 >  /* These functions *must* be inline or they will break horribly on
 > - * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. extern
 > - * inline should prevent the kernel from linking or module from
 > - * loading if they are not inlined. */
 > -extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
 > -			       unsigned long *flags)
 > + * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. */

Didn't that get fixed up for SPARC a year or so back?

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock()
  2006-08-15 22:50 ` Dave Jones
@ 2006-08-15 22:54   ` David Miller
  2006-08-15 23:14     ` Pavel Roskin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2006-08-15 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davej; +Cc: proski, netdev, bunk

From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:50:12 -0400

> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:25:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> 
>  > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
>  > index 16db3e1..8fd9b32 100644
>  > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
>  > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
>  > @@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ extern irqreturn_t orinoco_interrupt(int
>  >  /********************************************************************/
>  >  
>  >  /* These functions *must* be inline or they will break horribly on
>  > - * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. extern
>  > - * inline should prevent the kernel from linking or module from
>  > - * loading if they are not inlined. */
>  > -extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
>  > -			       unsigned long *flags)
>  > + * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. */
> 
> Didn't that get fixed up for SPARC a year or so back?

That's right, this problem no longer exists.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock()
  2006-08-15 22:54   ` David Miller
@ 2006-08-15 23:14     ` Pavel Roskin
  2006-08-15 23:26       ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Roskin @ 2006-08-15 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: davej, netdev, bunk

On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >  >  /* These functions *must* be inline or they will break horribly on
> >  > - * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. extern
> >  > - * inline should prevent the kernel from linking or module from
> >  > - * loading if they are not inlined. */
> >  > -extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
> >  > -			       unsigned long *flags)
> >  > + * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. */
> > 
> > Didn't that get fixed up for SPARC a year or so back?
> 
> That's right, this problem no longer exists.

Then, I guess, "static inline" would be just fine, right?

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock()
  2006-08-15 23:14     ` Pavel Roskin
@ 2006-08-15 23:26       ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2006-08-15 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: proski; +Cc: davej, netdev, bunk

From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:14:32 -0400

> On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > >  >  /* These functions *must* be inline or they will break horribly on
> > >  > - * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. extern
> > >  > - * inline should prevent the kernel from linking or module from
> > >  > - * loading if they are not inlined. */
> > >  > -extern inline int orinoco_lock(struct orinoco_private *priv,
> > >  > -			       unsigned long *flags)
> > >  > + * SPARC, due to its weird semantics for save/restore flags. */
> > > 
> > > Didn't that get fixed up for SPARC a year or so back?
> > 
> > That's right, this problem no longer exists.
> 
> Then, I guess, "static inline" would be just fine, right?

Yep.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-08-15 23:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-15 19:25 [PATCH] Use __always_inline in orinoco_lock()/orinoco_unlock() Pavel Roskin
2006-08-15 22:50 ` Dave Jones
2006-08-15 22:54   ` David Miller
2006-08-15 23:14     ` Pavel Roskin
2006-08-15 23:26       ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).