From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20060822.160618.130612620.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1156281182.2476.63.camel@entropy>
	<20060822143747.68acaf99.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
	<1156287492.2476.134.camel@entropy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:50123
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750943AbWHVXGF (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:06:05 -0400
To: nmiell@comcast.net
In-Reply-To: <1156287492.2476.134.camel@entropy>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:58:12 -0700

> Honestly, somebody with enough clout to make it stick needs to write out
> a spec describing what new kernel interfaces should look like and how
> they should fit in with existing interfaces.

With the time you spent writing this long email alone you could have
worked on either documenting Evgeniy's interfaces or trying to write
test applications against kevent to validate how useful the interfaces
are and if there are any problems with them.

You choose to rant and complain instead of participate.

Therefore, many of us cannot take you seriously.