From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] ipw2100: Make ipw2100 depends on known working platforms Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:11:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20060822091122.GA14142@infradead.org> References: <20060821033748.GA5371@mail.intel.com> <20060821095215.GB2770@infradead.org> <1156222231.17642.350.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:7072 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbWHVJL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:11:27 -0400 To: Zhu Yi Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156222231.17642.350.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:50:30PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > I'm not saying I'm not going to support it in the future. But currently > ipw2100 doesn't support big endian machines is the truth. One reason is > because I don't have such a box with an ipw2100 card. If you or someone > has such a platform and is willing to try patches for me, I'm happy to > get this done. That's why the ipw2200 driver has the BE supported. I'm happy to test ipw2100 on big endian systems if you send me a card.