From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6]: powerpc/cell spidernet bottom half Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:52:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20060823215246.GH4401@austin.ibm.com> References: <20060818220700.GG26889@austin.ibm.com> <20060818222657.GL26889@austin.ibm.com> <200608190103.05649.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Garzik , akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, James K Lewis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ens Osterkamp Return-path: Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:13778 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965224AbWHWVwt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:52:49 -0400 To: Arnd Bergmann Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608190103.05649.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:03:04AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > using the NAPI poll function Still fiddling with this. Getting side-tracked after noticing that the RX side generates a *huge* numbe of interrupts, despite code in the driver which superficially appears to be RX NAPI. One step forward, two steps back, isn't there a dance like that? --linas