From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [take13 1/3] kevent: Core files. Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:03:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20060824200322.GA19533@infradead.org> References: <11563322941645@2ka.mipt.ru> <11563322971212@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: lkml , David Miller , Ulrich Drepper , Andrew Morton , netdev , Zach Brown , Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:48076 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751692AbWHXUDk (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:03:40 -0400 To: Evgeniy Polyakov Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <11563322971212@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org One question on the implementation of kevent_user_ctl_modify/ kevent_user_ctl_remove/kevent_user_ctl_add: What benchmarks did you do to add the separate 'fastpath' with the single onstack ukevent structure if there are three or less events? I can't believe this actually helps in practice for various reasons: - you add quite a lot of icache footprint by duplicating all this code - kmalloc is really fast - two or three small copy_from/to_user calls are quite a bit slower than one that covers the size of all of them.