From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] d80211: indicate if unassociate/radio off status Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:17:34 -0700 Message-ID: <200608281417.39948.flamingice@sourmilk.net> References: <44F356DF.9000000@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2054624.IPlkY8fIxb"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jbenc@suse.cz Return-path: Received: from server8.tchmachines.com ([216.180.241.250]:44248 "EHLO server8.tchmachines.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472AbWH1VRx (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:17:53 -0400 To: mabbas In-Reply-To: <44F356DF.9000000@linux.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --nextPart2054624.IPlkY8fIxb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline It would be helpful if you inlined your patches instead of attaching them n= ext=20 time. I'm not comfortable with using the name for this purpose. Don't we just rep= ort=20 00:00:00:00:00:00 when not associated? Also, for radio off, wasn't that bei= ng=20 covered by the rfkill patches? =2DMichael Wu --nextPart2054624.IPlkY8fIxb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBE811zT3Oqt9AH4aERAvZMAJjCtMkHP5ZDPRet5acA5Q+Izf00AJ9qworg +xSKeXDpJT3mwfJZZD6gxQ== =cLpb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2054624.IPlkY8fIxb--