From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: neigh_lookup lockdep warning
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 21:26:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060903012659.GA28183@redhat.com> (raw)
Seen during boot of a 2.6.18rc5-git1 based kernel.
Dave
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.17-1.2608.fc6 #1
-------------------------------------------------------
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
(&tbl->lock){-+-+}, at: [<c05bdf97>] neigh_lookup+0x50/0xaf
but task is already holding lock:
(&list->lock#3){-+..}, at: [<c05bf677>] neigh_proxy_process+0x20/0xc2
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&list->lock#3){-+..}:
[<c043c09a>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
[<c061411f>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x22/0x32
[<c05b451f>] skb_dequeue+0x12/0x43
[<c05b523a>] skb_queue_purge+0x14/0x1b
[<c05be990>] neigh_update+0x34a/0x3a6
[<c05f0f6e>] arp_process+0x4ad/0x4e7
[<c05f107c>] arp_rcv+0xd4/0xf1
[<c05b942c>] netif_receive_skb+0x205/0x274
[<c7bb0566>] rhine_napipoll+0x28d/0x449 [via_rhine]
[<c05baf73>] net_rx_action+0x9d/0x196
[<c04293a7>] __do_softirq+0x78/0xf2
[<c0406673>] do_softirq+0x5a/0xbe
-> #1 (&n->lock){-+..}:
[<c043c09a>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
[<c0613e48>] _write_lock+0x19/0x28
[<c05bfc69>] neigh_periodic_timer+0x98/0x13c
[<c042dc58>] run_timer_softirq+0x108/0x167
[<c04293a7>] __do_softirq+0x78/0xf2
[<c0406673>] do_softirq+0x5a/0xbe
-> #0 (&tbl->lock){-+-+}:
[<c043c09a>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
[<c0613f02>] _read_lock_bh+0x1e/0x2d
[<c05bdf97>] neigh_lookup+0x50/0xaf
[<c05bf0b9>] neigh_event_ns+0x2c/0x77
[<c05f0e2a>] arp_process+0x369/0x4e7
[<c05f10a1>] parp_redo+0x8/0xa
[<c05bf6bd>] neigh_proxy_process+0x66/0xc2
[<c042dc58>] run_timer_softirq+0x108/0x167
[<c04293a7>] __do_softirq+0x78/0xf2
[<c0406673>] do_softirq+0x5a/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by swapper/0:
#0: (&list->lock#3){-+..}, at: [<c05bf677>] neigh_proxy_process+0x20/0xc2
stack backtrace:
[<c04051ee>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x58/0x159
[<c04057ea>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
[<c0405903>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<c043b182>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x59/0x64
[<c043b99a>] __lock_acquire+0x80d/0x99c
[<c043c09a>] lock_acquire+0x4b/0x6d
[<c0613f02>] _read_lock_bh+0x1e/0x2d
[<c05bdf97>] neigh_lookup+0x50/0xaf
[<c05bf0b9>] neigh_event_ns+0x2c/0x77
[<c05f0e2a>] arp_process+0x369/0x4e7
[<c05f10a1>] parp_redo+0x8/0xa
[<c05bf6bd>] neigh_proxy_process+0x66/0xc2
[<c042dc58>] run_timer_softirq+0x108/0x167
[<c04293a7>] __do_softirq+0x78/0xf2
[<c0406673>] do_softirq+0x5a/0xbe
[<c0429250>] irq_exit+0x3d/0x3f
[<c0417cbf>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x79/0x7e
[<c0404b0a>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
DWARF2 unwinder stuck at apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30
Leftover inexact backtrace:
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
VGER BF report: U 0.489161
next reply other threads:[~2006-09-03 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-03 1:26 Dave Jones [this message]
2006-09-03 11:32 ` neigh_lookup lockdep warning Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060903012659.GA28183@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).