From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org>, Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org>,
Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
alexey@sw.ru, sam@vilain.net
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] network namespaces
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:19:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060910191900.GA5325@MAIL.13thfloor.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m14pvggzgw.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 09:41:35PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:57:24AM +0400, Dmitry Mishin wrote:
> >> On Friday 08 September 2006 22:11, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> >> > actually the light-weight ip isolation runs perfectly
> >> > fine _without_ CAP_NET_ADMIN, as you do not want the
> >> > guest to be able to mess with the 'configured' ips at
> >> > all (not to speak of interfaces here)
> >
> >> It was only an example. I'm thinking about how to implement flexible
> >> solution, which permits light-weight ip isolation as well as
> >> full-fledged netwrok virtualization. Another solution is to split
> >> CONFIG_NET_NAMESPACE. Is it good for you?
> >
> > well, I think it would be best to have both, as
> > they are complementary to some degree, and IMHO
> > both, the full virtualization _and_ the isolation
> > will require a separate namespace to work, I also
> > think that limiting the isolation to something
> > very simple (like one IP + network or so) would
> > be acceptable for a start, because especially
> > multi IP or network range checks require a little
> > more efford to get them right ...
> >
> > I do not think that folks would want to recompile
> > their kernel just to get a light-weight guest or
> > a fully virtualized one
>
> I certainly agree that we are not at a point where a final decision
> can be made. A major piece of that is that a layer 2 approach has
> not shown to be without a performance penalty.
>
> A practical question. Do the IPs assigned to guests ever get used
> by anything besides the guest?
only in special setups and for testing routing and
general operation of course, i.e. one typical
failure scenario is this:
- 'provider' has a bunch of ips assigned
- 'host' ip works perfectly
- 'guest' ip is not routed (by the external router)
in this case, for example, I always suggest to test
on the host with a guest ip, simplest example:
ping -I <guest-ip> google.com
but for 'normal' operation, the guest ip is reserved
for the guests, unless some service like named is
shared between guests ...
HTH,
Herbert
> Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-10 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-15 14:20 [RFC] network namespaces Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/9] network namespaces: core and device list Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-16 14:46 ` Dave Hansen
2006-08-16 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/9] network namespaces: IPv4 routing Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/9] network namespaces: playing and debugging Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-16 16:46 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-16 17:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-17 6:28 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-17 8:30 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/9] network namespaces: socket hashes Andrey Savochkin
2006-09-18 15:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-20 16:32 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-09-21 12:34 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] network namespaces: async socket operations Andrey Savochkin
2006-09-22 15:33 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-23 13:16 ` Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] allow proc_dir_entries to have destructor Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 7/9] net_device seq_file Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 8/9] network namespaces: device to pass packets between namespaces Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-15 14:48 ` [PATCH 9/9] network namespaces: playing with pass-through device Andrey Savochkin
2006-08-16 11:53 ` [RFC] network namespaces Serge E. Hallyn
2006-08-16 15:12 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-08-16 17:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-08-17 8:29 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-09-05 13:34 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-05 14:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-05 15:32 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-05 16:53 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-05 18:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 14:52 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-09-06 15:09 ` [Devel] " Kir Kolyshkin
2006-09-06 9:10 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-06 16:56 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-06 17:37 ` [Devel] " Kir Kolyshkin
2006-09-06 18:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 18:58 ` Kir Kolyshkin
2006-09-06 20:53 ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-09-06 23:06 ` Caitlin Bestler
2006-09-06 23:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 0:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-09-07 5:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 8:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-07 18:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-08 6:02 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-07 16:23 ` [Devel] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-09-07 17:27 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-07 19:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-08 13:10 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-09-08 18:11 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-09 7:57 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-09-10 2:47 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-10 3:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-10 8:11 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-09-10 11:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-10 19:19 ` Herbert Poetzl [this message]
2006-09-10 7:45 ` [Devel] " Dmitry Mishin
2006-09-10 19:22 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-12 3:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-11 14:40 ` [Devel] " Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-11 14:57 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-09-11 15:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-11 15:10 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-09-12 3:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-12 7:38 ` Dmitry Mishin
2006-09-06 21:44 ` [Devel] " Daniel Lezcano
2006-09-06 17:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-05 15:47 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-09-05 17:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 20:25 ` Cedric Le Goater
2006-09-06 20:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-04 9:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060910191900.GA5325@MAIL.13thfloor.at \
--to=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=alexey@sw.ru \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dim@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kir@openvz.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@vilain.net \
--cc=saw@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).