From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniele Lacamera Subject: Re: TCP Pacing Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:18:39 +0200 Message-ID: <200609131018.40023.root@danielinux.net> References: <200609121958.22820.root@danielinux.net> <5640c7e00609121426t75f5519at562a85f40b64163@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: root@danielinux.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Carlo Caini" , "Rosario Firrincieli" , "Giovanni Pau" Return-path: Received: from danielinux.vm.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.95.85]:6661 "EHLO danielinux.vm.bytemark.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbWIMISk (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:18:40 -0400 To: "Ian McDonald" In-Reply-To: <5640c7e00609121426t75f5519at562a85f40b64163@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 12 September 2006 23:26, Ian McDonald wrote: > Where is the published research? If you are going to mention research > you need URLs to papers and please put this in source code too so > people can check. I added the main reference to the code. I am going to give you all the pointers on this research, mainly recent congestion control proposals that include pacing. > I agree with Arnaldo's comments and also would add I don't like having > to select 1000 as HZ unit. Something is wrong if you need this as I > can run higher resolution timers without having to do this.... I removed that select in Kconfig, I agree it doesn't make sense at all, for portability. However, pacing works with 1ms resolution, so maybe a "depends HZ_1000" is still required. (How do you run 1ms timers with HZ!=1000?) Thanks -- Daniele Lacamera root@danielinux.net