From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for system lockups in 2.6.18-rcX caused by bcm43xx
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:25:32 +0200
Message-ID: <20060914082532.GA2513@ff.dom.local>
References: <4505DD51.5090000@garzik.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:26499 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467AbWINIVm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:21:42 -0400
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4505DD51.5090000@garzik.org>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 12-09-2006 00:04, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
...
>> Not too explicitly, but I think Andrew mentions it in "The Perfect 
>> Patch":
>>
>>     http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt
>>
>> While you are looking, you might review Jeff's version of the same idea:
>>
>>     http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
> 
> And also Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which ATM seems to have more 
> detail than either page.
> 
>     Jeff

"Attachments are discouraged, but some corporate mail systems 
provide no other way to send patches."

I thought they didn't read this but now I understand for whom 
Mozilla Firefox is breaking all those lines with no mercy!

Jarek P.