From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx-softmac: improve wrong firmware message Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:00:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20060914140034.GB27558@tuxdriver.com> References: <45071890.mailJEJ1PQOHG@lwfinger.net> <20060912214939.GA3750@tuba> <45072F4D.80109@lwfinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Martin Langer , Bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, Michael Buesch , Stefano Brivio Return-path: To: Larry Finger Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45072F4D.80109-tQ5ms3gMjBLk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: bcm43xx-dev-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 05:06:05PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > Martin Langer wrote: > > > >Why not writing both (ucode rev and driver version)? Something like > > > > "from version 4.x binary drivers (rev>0x128).\n" > > > >BTW, if anybody needs the relationship between ucode revsion and driver > >version then he should look at the table here: > > > >http://www.langerland.de/linux/bcm43xx/firmware.html > > I could do that; however, I think this error message may have a short life > as I'm just now looking at Michael's v4 firmware revisions for d80211 with > an eye toward porting them to softmac. > > John - what do you think? Let's just take the new/current patch as-is. Someone who understands "rev > 0x128" should be able to find the message in the code for himself... :-) John -- John W. Linville linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org