From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Subject: Re: [PATCH] please include in 2.6.18: e100 disable device on PCI error Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:09:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20060918210945.GF29167@austin.ibm.com> References: <20060918200122.GD29167@austin.ibm.com> <20060918132102.d850c1c2.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Rajesh Shah , "Ronciak, John" , "bibo,mao" , Auke Kok , Auke Kok Return-path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:29352 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183AbWIRVJq (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:09:46 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060918132102.d850c1c2.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org It seems our mails crossed. On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:21:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > hm. I don't have this patch queued, but I _do_ have an equivalent patch > for e1000 queued; what's up with that? Nobody seems to have paid much > attention to the e1000 fix. I spotted the e100 patch in your "broken-out" patches earlier today, as a part of "git-netdev-all.patch" (where it had the right changelog and old acks) > If we can gather the appropriate acks quickly then I expect we can get both > of these into 2.6.18. That would be great! Thanks. --linas