From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: set congestion default through Kconfig Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060919.123054.83620346.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20060918.115309.88343320.davem@davemloft.net> <20060918195224.GA26585@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20060918214104.3824a2e2@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:19848 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751033AbWISTat (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:30:49 -0400 To: shemminger@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20060918214104.3824a2e2@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Actually, I take that back: net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c: In function $,1rx(Btcp_congestion_default$,1ry(B: net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c:134: error: syntax error before $,1rx(B}$,1ry(B token net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c: At top level: net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c:136: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type I'll fix this up, but I'm seeing a very disturbing pattern lately of very clueful people posting patches without typing "make". Is this too much to ask these days? This costs me an enormous amount of time, to review someone's patch and verify it's logical correctness, only to check it in and find out that it doesn't even build. That, frankly, is unacceptable.