From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Buesch Subject: Re: [patch 09/11] b44: fix eeprom endianess issue Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:47:25 +0200 Message-ID: <200609261747.25575.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <200609252339.k8PNdNE4002654@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <45186D66.1000508@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mb@bu3sch.de, Gary Zambrano , akpm@osdl.org Return-path: Received: from static-ip-62-75-166-246.inaddr.intergenia.de ([62.75.166.246]:30681 "EHLO bu3sch.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751265AbWIZPrl (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:47:41 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <45186D66.1000508@garzik.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 26 September 2006 01:59, Jeff Garzik wrote: > akpm@osdl.org wrote: > > From: Michael Buesch > > > > This fixes eeprom read on big-endian architectures. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch > > Cc: Jeff Garzik > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > > --- > > > > drivers/net/b44.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff -puN drivers/net/b44.c~b44-fix-eeprom-endianess-issue drivers/net/b44.c > > --- a/drivers/net/b44.c~b44-fix-eeprom-endianess-issue > > +++ a/drivers/net/b44.c > > @@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ static int b44_read_eeprom(struct b44 *b > > u16 *ptr = (u16 *) data; > > > > for (i = 0; i < 128; i += 2) > > - ptr[i / 2] = readw(bp->regs + 4096 + i); > > + ptr[i / 2] = cpu_to_le16(readw(bp->regs + 4096 + i)); > > Seems highly silly to me: readw() already swaps on big endian, so > you're just swapping again. And then... read the call of > b44_read_eeprom(): bp->dev->dev_addr[] assignment is such that it swaps > YET AGAIN. > > Seems like a better solution would be to remove the manual swap from the > caller of b44_read_eeprom(). I already explained this to you, but I will repeat me. readw returns the data in CPU order. With cpu_to_le16 we convert it to little endian, because "ptr" is a pointer to a _byte_ arrray. See the cast above. A byte array is little endian. Should I go into deeper detail, or did you get it? ;) The dev_addr assignment _intentionally_ swaps yet again, because the values are stored in bigendian format in the SPROM. Removing the swap for dev_addr would definately the worse and wrong solution. -- Greetings Michael.