From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [take19 0/4] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:46:09 +0400 Message-ID: <20060927044608.GA8965@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <115a6230591036@2ka.mipt.ru> <11587449471424@2ka.mipt.ru> <20060922122207.3b716028.akpm@osdl.org> <20060926155416.GB32030@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml , David Miller , Ulrich Drepper , netdev , Zach Brown , Chase Venters Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:52201 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964970AbWI0Eq4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:46:56 -0400 To: Christoph Hellwig Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060926155416.GB32030@infradead.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:54:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org) wrote: > > > Generic event handling mechanism. > > > > > > Consider for inclusion. > > > > Ulrich's objections sounded substantial, and afaik remain largely > > unresolved. How do we sort this out? > > I haven't seen any of Ulrichs points (which mostly is a large subset of > my objection) beeing addressed. Could you please be more specific? As far as I can see I addressed all suggestions made by Christoph and still waiting for comments about my points after reply to Ulrich's. -- Evgeniy Polyakov