From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATH] Allow mtu bigger than 1500 for ieee80211 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:47:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20060929154751.GA23067@zlug.org> References: <451C0D05.4050705@free.fr> <1159515501.2644.3.camel@ux156> <20060929093050.GA19115@zlug.org> <1159530970.2644.21.camel@ux156> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: matthieu castet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from ironport-c10.fh-zwickau.de ([141.32.72.200]:60089 "EHLO ironport-c10.fh-zwickau.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932304AbWI2Prx (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:47:53 -0400 To: Johannes Berg Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1159530970.2644.21.camel@ux156> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:56:10PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:30 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Isn't 68 the minimum MTU required by IPv4? > > No idea, but shouldn't there be a named constant somewhere for that > then? Maybe. Other network drivers also implement this number as a hard value in their change_mtu callback. For example, the default ethernet function is implemented this way. Joerg