From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivo van Doorn Subject: Re: d80211: ieee80211_hw handlers in atomic context Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:32:39 +0200 Message-ID: <200610051732.39319.IvDoorn@gmail.com> References: <4523DA7D.2080604@web.de> <200610051700.31171.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <45252102.8030402@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jiri Benc , netdev Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:2531 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063AbWJEPdd (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:33:33 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o38so205409ugd for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:33:32 -0700 (PDT) To: Jan Kiszka In-Reply-To: <45252102.8030402@web.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi, > > This does not happen in rt2500usb driver, since no TSF handling is possible > > due to a lack of TSF registers in the device. > > This path would be fixed by my conversion patch of sta.timer into > sta.work that I sent you yesterday privately. Unfortunately, I don't > have a copy at hand ATM. That is what I expect as well, I'll ask confirmation from the person who submitted this bug. > What about the other timers? Can they trigger any sleeping service of > rt2x00 drivers? Ok, waiting for a BUG is always possible... ;) Well I currently have no time to check it, but can config_interface handler still be called from interrupt context or has this also been fixed? Ivo