From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul.moore@hp.com Subject: [PATCH 0/1] NetLabel changes from yesterday's discussion Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:28:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20061005222823.387569000@hp.com> Cc: jmorris@namei.org Return-path: Received: from atlrel7.hp.com ([156.153.255.213]:23209 "EHLO atlrel7.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932396AbWJEWhF (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:37:05 -0400 To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org In case you missed it (har har) there was a pretty good discussion about labeled networking yesterday. One of the results of the dicussion was the realization that the way NetLabel determines what to use for the SELinux TE portion of the packet's label was not the best choice. This patch should address the issue. This patch does not rely on the secid patches currently in progress and should be considered a bugfix against the current net-2.6 tree. -- paul moore linux security @ hp