From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Caitlin Bestler <caitlin.bestler@gmail.com>,
Martin Schiller <mschiller@tdt.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suppress / delay SYN-ACK
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:57:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061012175720.004e82b9@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452EC7B9.2030801@hp.com>
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:54:49 -0700
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:
> > More to the point, on what basis would the application be rejecting a
> > connection request based solely on the SYN?
>
> True, it isn't like there would suddenly be any call user data as in XTI/TLI.
>
> > There are only two pieces of information available: the remote IP
> > address and port, and the total number of pending requests. The
> > latter is already addressed through the backlog size, and netfilter
> > rules can already be used to reject based on IP address.
>
> It would though allow an application to have an even more restricted set of
> allowed IP's than was set in netfilter. Rather like allowing the application to
> set socket buffer sizes rather than relying on the system's default.
>
Some version of BSD sockets had this behaviour, perhaps you should use
the same model. It was some socket option, I can't remember; what ever
it wasn't widely adopted. Nothing says you can't just use shutdown() to
force a RST on the addresses you don't want to talk to.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-13 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-12 8:08 Suppress / delay SYN-ACK Martin Schiller
2006-10-12 8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 10:13 ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-12 10:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-12 10:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 10:53 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-12 10:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 16:13 ` Rick Jones
2006-10-12 21:58 ` Caitlin Bestler
2006-10-12 22:12 ` jamal
2006-10-12 22:54 ` Rick Jones
2006-10-13 0:57 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-10-13 4:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-13 16:39 ` Rick Jones
2006-10-13 20:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-13 21:50 ` Rick Jones
2006-10-16 6:52 ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-13 5:41 ` Stephen J. Bevan
2006-10-13 6:28 ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-16 7:02 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-10-17 12:04 ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-17 12:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18 6:23 ` Martin Schiller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061012175720.004e82b9@localhost.localdomain \
--to=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=caitlin.bestler@gmail.com \
--cc=mschiller@tdt.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).