netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Caitlin Bestler <caitlin.bestler@gmail.com>,
	Martin Schiller <mschiller@tdt.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Suppress / delay SYN-ACK
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:57:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061012175720.004e82b9@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <452EC7B9.2030801@hp.com>

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:54:49 -0700
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com> wrote:

> > More to the point, on what basis would the application be rejecting a
> > connection request based solely on the SYN?
> 
> True, it isn't like there would suddenly be any call user data as in XTI/TLI.
> 
> > There are only two pieces of information available: the remote IP
> > address and port, and the total number of pending requests. The
> > latter is already addressed through the backlog size, and netfilter
> > rules can already be used to reject based on IP address.
> 
> It would though allow an application to have an even more restricted set of 
> allowed IP's than was set in netfilter.  Rather like allowing the application to 
> set socket buffer sizes rather than relying on the system's default.
>

Some version of BSD sockets had this behaviour, perhaps you should use
the same model.  It was some socket option, I can't remember; what ever
it wasn't widely adopted. Nothing says you can't just use shutdown() to
force a RST on the addresses you don't want to talk to.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-13  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-12  8:08 Suppress / delay SYN-ACK Martin Schiller
2006-10-12  8:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 10:13   ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-12 10:31     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-12 10:39       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 10:53         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-12 10:36     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-12 16:13 ` Rick Jones
2006-10-12 21:58   ` Caitlin Bestler
2006-10-12 22:12     ` jamal
2006-10-12 22:54     ` Rick Jones
2006-10-13  0:57       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2006-10-13  4:11       ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-13 16:39         ` Rick Jones
2006-10-13 20:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-13 21:50             ` Rick Jones
2006-10-16  6:52             ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-13  5:41     ` Stephen J. Bevan
2006-10-13  6:28       ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-16  7:02 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-10-17 12:04   ` Martin Schiller
2006-10-17 12:54     ` Eric Dumazet
2006-10-18  6:23       ` Martin Schiller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061012175720.004e82b9@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=caitlin.bestler@gmail.com \
    --cc=mschiller@tdt.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).