From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:58:14 -0700 Message-ID: <20061016165814.13b99e5e.akpm@osdl.org> References: <200610052105.00359.ak@suse.de> <1160080954.29690.44.camel@flooterbu> <200610052250.55146.ak@suse.de> <1160101394.29690.48.camel@flooterbu> <20061006143312.GB9881@skynet.ie> <20061006153629.GA19756@in.ibm.com> <20061006171105.GC9881@skynet.ie> <1160157830.29690.66.camel@flooterbu> <20061006200436.GG19756@in.ibm.com> <20061016181613.GA30090@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steve Fox , Andi Kleen , Badari Pulavarty , Martin Bligh , lkml , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, Andy Whitcroft , Adrian Bunk , Mel Gorman Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:59588 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422953AbWJQABw (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:01:52 -0400 To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20061016181613.GA30090@in.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:16:13 -0400 Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Can you please have a look at the attached patch Looks like a fine patch to me, although it could benefit from a comment explaining why all those PAGE_ALIGN()s are in there. > and include it in -mm. Does it fix a patch in -mm or is it needed in mainline?