From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20061020.122427.55507415.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20061019171814.281988608@osdl.org> <20061020.001530.35664340.davem@davemloft.net> <20061020081857.743b5eb7@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:62872 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992724AbWJTTY1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:24:27 -0400 To: shemminger@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20061020081857.743b5eb7@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:18:57 -0700 > Netdump is not in the tree, so I can't fix it. Also netdump is pretty > much superseded by kdump. Unless kdump is %100 ready you can be sure vendors will ship netdump for a little while longer. I think gratuitously breaking netdump is not the best idea. It's not like netdump is some binary blob you can't get the source to easily. :-)