From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add Regulatory Domain support to d80211
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:03:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061024120303.GB30724@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43e72e890610232233t14ee98f6j5d5facf1b7aab08b@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:33:32AM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On 10/23/06, Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> >On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 18:41 -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> >> The current setup on d80211.h makes regulatory domains device
> >> specific. I believe this should be changed to be stack-specific --
> >> that is, all drivers adhere to the restrictions set by the stack's
> >> current regulatory domain.
> >
> >There should be a way to have a certain device restrict that even
> >further, if the driver wants to allow operation only in a domain that
> >the device has been certified for (because it may malfunction otherwise,
> >for example).
>
> Sure good idea -- we can provide a device specific regulatory domain
> if necessary. We can easily introduce a device_regdomains linked list
> on the ieee80211_conf which if not empty the driver will use it, else
> the stack regdomain is used. The ieee80211_regdomains module already
> provides the interfaces for the manipulation of such list. Pretty easy
> fix, fortunately.
It might be nice if this could be a "logical AND" operation? So if the
device was certified for X, Y, and Z and the current domain allows V,
W, and X then only X would be allowed. Perhaps it is too complicated
to be worthwhile, but it seems doable and would be a nice flexibility.
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-24 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-23 22:41 [RFC] [PATCH 0/3] Add Regulatory Domain support to d80211 Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-23 23:32 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-24 5:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-24 12:03 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2006-10-24 17:41 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-25 8:24 ` Jiri Benc
2006-10-25 16:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-24 8:25 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-24 17:31 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-24 14:02 ` David Kimdon
2006-10-24 17:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-24 20:03 ` Simon Barber
2006-10-24 22:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-24 22:52 ` Michael Wu
2006-10-25 17:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-25 22:00 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-26 14:35 ` Dan Williams
2006-10-26 14:43 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-26 15:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2006-10-26 15:33 ` Dan Williams
2006-10-26 21:41 ` Simon Barber
2006-10-26 21:47 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-26 21:48 ` Johannes Berg
2006-10-24 22:56 ` Simon Barber
2006-10-25 5:03 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061024120303.GB30724@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).