From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hagen@jauu.net
Cc: jheffner@psc.edu, shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:02:21 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061026.170221.99202188.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061026235256.GB2018@c3po.0xdef.net>
This is driving me crazy...
Your email client turned the tabs into spaces in the patch making it
useless.
I want to ask why it is so hard for people to submit patches that are
not corrupted? :-/
I type in this kind of email response at least 2 or 3 times every
single day that I review patches. Spending the time to review a patch
only to find out that it is corrupted and doesn't apply consumes a
significant chunk of my time.
Again, send the patch in an email to yourself and try to apply the
patch from that email if you are in doubt.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-27 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 18:08 [RFC] tcp: setsockopt congestion control autoload Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-25 23:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 5:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-26 14:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-26 14:57 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-10-26 15:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-26 17:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-10-26 20:55 ` David Miller
2006-10-26 17:29 ` John Heffner
2006-10-26 20:57 ` David Miller
2006-10-26 22:44 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-26 22:53 ` John Heffner
2006-10-26 23:52 ` [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-26 23:59 ` Ian McDonald
2006-10-27 0:07 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 0:20 ` Ian McDonald
2006-10-27 0:02 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-10-27 10:43 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-27 14:41 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 15:21 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2006-10-27 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 17:30 ` [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 17:43 ` John Heffner
2006-10-27 17:59 ` [PATCH] tcp: allow restricting congestion control choices Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:17 ` [PATCH] tcp: don't allow unfair congestion control to be built without warning David Miller
2006-10-27 21:24 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:37 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 21:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 22:12 ` David Miller
2006-10-27 22:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 22:24 ` David Miller
2006-10-28 0:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-28 3:10 ` [RFC] tcp: available congetsion control Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 21:22 ` [PATCH] Check if user has CAP_NET_ADMIN to change congestion control algorithm David Miller
2006-10-27 1:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-10-27 18:14 ` [PATCH] tcp: setsockopt congestion control autoload Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061026.170221.99202188.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).